The Chairman of Three Years Jotna, Abdou Njie and the pressure group’s founder Musa Koteh have both spoken to forGambia News and Radio and stated that they have ended the back-and-forth between the two top figures. They were speaking to forGambia, on Monday from both The Gambia, where Njie is, and the United States where Koteh is presently. We thank both Njie and Koteh for the wonderful maturity and understanding!
Chairman Njie told this medium that this whole thing should never be seen as a brawl in his banned group, Three Years Jotna as an organization. Instead, it should be seen as an encounter between two individuals, not the entire group.
The chairman has promised this medium that he had ended the conflict with Koteh. Koteh in return has told us that he had also ceased and desisted. Both spent some time talking to this editor as well as sending some audio files which they both urged us to finish listening to.
In his part, the group’s founder Musa Koteh told forGambia that he has now ended the brawl. He even tried to reach out to Chairman Njie whose phone wasn’t letting him connect. Koteh wasn’t even aware of any audio circulating about him for months until recently.
We have also spoken to other execs of the popular Barrow anathema that was for sometime a hot subject for both the local and international press. Meanwhile, we reproduce below, a gloat of a publication from our “Leading journalist” Pa Nderry Mbai of “Leading Freedom Newspaper:”
“BREAKING NEWS: ROW AT THE BANNED THREE YEARS JOTNA MOVEMENT, AS EX CHAIRMAN ABDOU NJIE AND THE MOVEMENT’S DE FACTO LEADER KING SPORTS EXPOSES EACH OTHER’S DIRTY LEANS!”
“There is mounting tension at the banned the three years jotna movement amid accusations and counter-accusations between the former Chairman of the movement Abdou Njie, and the De Facto leader of the movement Musa Koteh, AKA King Sports, Freedom Newspaper can report. As we report, the row between Njie and Koteh has escalated with the duos exposing their dirty leans in the public domain.”
While the Barrow govt’s negligence, apathy, and heartlessness to Gambians’ plight with Chinese fishmeal companies wreaking not only environmental and economic havoc on poor Gambians, but also causing mass arrest of Gambians still persist, our “Leading journalist” Pa Nderry Mbai doesn’t see the need for journalism in giving more attention to such burning issues.
He doesn’t also see the need to give the deserved coverage to the killing of Gibril Ceesay where the real victim is ignored for a special group and a very special interest. Seventy-two hours is up for the youths of Sanyang. But still, they’re not released.
Again, Freedom Newspaper doesn’t give that a headline! Or yet, Adama Barrow is ripping off those same poor Sanyang youths as well as other Gambian youths, the elderly, men, women, and children of other communities in our poor Gambia when he claims D150,000.00 daily fish money.
The Fatou-Bah Barrow D35 million theft is still unsolved and ignored. Now it’s Nawec that has a missing D15 million. Again, those aren’t headlines that need continuous follow-up in the brain of our “Leading journalist.”
Barrow’s daily D150,000.00 alone is a decade-long give away for journalists. The same Barrow and his cronies are building mansions, some in Dakar, from the blood and sweat of the late Gibril Ceesay of Sanyang, the murdered youths of Faraba, and our mothers.
Do you know what is a burning headline for our “Leading journalist?” The above breaking news which is nothing short of a propaganda pendulum for Barrow and his co-thieves! For months, this shameless editor has been branding 3YRS Jotna as a UDP offshoot or “Darboe’s boys.”
But let’s quickly look at the “leading journalist’s” English first. Please let’s not even mention his journalism before many readers start puking. He couldn’t even differentiate between “Linen” and “Leans.”
Of course, he wanted to come up with a headline with “Linen”, not Leans. For the Dickens it’s “Dirty linen,” Mr. Piggity-wickity, not “Dirty leans” as you wrote in your caption and first paragraph! Here’s how to use both:
Papa Colley “leans” towards any view to vote Barrow out! Here, lean assumes an ‘s’ due to subject-verb agreement! But Papa Colley has some dirty “linen” is a totally different ball game, Mr. Pigitty-wickity! Without the ‘s’, lean could mean skinny or less fatty tissue.
“Linen” simply means clothes, garments, or sheets of fabric. Yours wasn’t any typo when it’s done in different parts of your article in a repetition. You simply couldn’t differentiate the two words!
If you’re going to be a corrupt and heartless president’s tail, please it’s not a bad idea to be on top of your game first! You seriously and most blatantly suck at what you do, yet choose to throw stones at others—an inveterate habit of yours for years now.